By Manford Eugene Jones
A thesis submitted
in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of
Arts in History.
University of New
Mexico, 1939
Texas
A&M University History Professor Dale Baum purchased a copy of this
thesis from the university's library and contributed it to this
site. It is used with permission of Manford
Allen Jones, son of the author Manford Eugene Jones. These
electronic pages may not be reproduced in any
format by other organizations or individuals. Persons or organizations
desiring to use this material must obtain
the written consent of Manford Allen Jones or contact
Jane
Keppler, Robertson
County TXGenWeb coordinator.
CHAPTER V: PROBLEMS OF COTTON
MARKETING
There
is plenty of romance connected with the marketing of cotton along the
Brazos. It is the story of a continual struggle between the
seller and buyer, with the seller fighting for his right to get a fair
price for, and good grading of, his cotton.[25]
The
first planters freighted their cotton to Houston and Galveston and sold
it to cotton factors. These factors extended credit to the
planters through local stores, and the cotton producer did not know
what price he would get until the cotton was delivered at the
seaport. Under this system, the farmer paid heavily for
transportation and interest, and the factor took a far profit on the
actual price paid.
The
Grange or Granger movement came to the Bottom in the 1870s. In
each town, cooperatively owned stores were set up to furnish the farm
groceries and to pay him a fair price for his cotton. A few of
these stores were in business until 1900, but disappeared soon
thereafter.
In
the meantime, or rather after the railroads came to the Bottom towns,
local merchants also furnished farmers with credit to make their crop,
and then bought their cotton in the fall. These merchants took a
heavy profit. At the same time, local independent buyers began
operating during the selling season. This latter group included
several Jews who came to Calvert and Hearne.
The
second attempt at cooperation was the Farmers Alliance:
"It
was only a few years after the decline of the Grange that the Farmers
Alliance movement became widespread. Membership in this order was
strong in the Southern states, and the organization definitely
committed itself to the cooperative marketing of farm products, with
particular attention being paid to cotton. A number of local
organizations were set up, and plans were made to sell direct to
mills. The plans were finally unsuccessful, however, principally
because the widespread crop mortgage system prohibited the marketing of
cotton through these organizations. The Alliance made attempts to
finance the growers, but lacked the necessary resources."
"The
Farmers Alliance from the beginning engaged in politics, and, as it
became larger, it political activities increased. In the election
of 1892, it fortunes became involved with those of the Populist party,
and, with its defeat, the Alliance became less and less an influence."[26]
The
Farmers Alliance came to the towns of the Central Brazos region in the
1890s. A large warehouse was built in each town, in which to
store cotton belonging to members of the Alliance. The Cotton was
sold in large groups and sometimes held for an advance in price.
The
third attempt at cooperation is explained in the following quotation:
"The
next significant contribution to the foundation of cooperative
marketing in the South was perhaps made by the Farmers' Union, to to
give it its full title, the Farmers' Educational and Cooperative Union
of America. This movement originated in Texas, in 1902, and grew
rapidly. Of all the organizations which attained prominence up to
1920, this was the most distinctly Southern, and its efforts were
devoted principally to the problems of the cotton farmer."
During
the first years of the Farmers' Union, attention was focused mainly
upon the marketing of cotton. The activities of the Union along
these lines were closely allied with the program of the Southern Cotton
Association, which had been organized in new Orleans in 1905 under the
leadership of Colonel Harvie Jordan, a Georgia planter. The
conviction had become widely prevalent that the cotton futures markets,
instead of functioning as exchange agencies, were being manipulated to
the advantage of the gambler, and at a severe loss to the farmer.
The Union advocated a minimum price, and advised the farmer to hold his
cotton until he could sell at that level. In 1906, the farmers
were told to hold their cotton for at least eleven cents, basis
middling. As the Union predicted, the price reached and passed
that level, rising from nine and a quarter cents at New Orleans in
September to eleven cents in October."
While
the efforts of none of the earlier organizations of farmers in the
South could be called successful, and while none fulfilled the
sometimes extravagant promises made for them, in the light of present
day evaluation, each contributed something to the eventual success of
cooperative marketing."
Perhaps
the most valuable result of these early experiences was the
demonstration to Southern farmers of the ideals and practicability of
cooperative endeavor. This did much to pave the way for the
successful cooperative organizations of today."[27]
When
the Farmers' Union was organized in Hearne, Calvert, Marlin, and Waco,
the name Farmers Alliance on the warehouses was changed to Farmers
Union. The Farmers Union lost out for the same reason that the
Alliance did, because it engaged too much in politics.
At
the present time in Waco and Marlin, the Bottom farmers are served by
the Texas Cotton Cooperative Association, a branch of the American
Cotton Cooperative Association, New Orleans, Louisiana. The
"Texas Co-op", as this organization is called, attempts to give its
members the benefit of buyers skilled in the art of grading cotton and
also the benefit of a slightly higher price through mass sales of
cotton.
The
various cotton cooperative associations perform many services for the
farmer that private buyers do no or cannot do. These services are
expert classing of cotton, cheaper freight rates, and a better
price. In some instances, the independent buyer has been able to
beat the price paid by the cooperative because of the cost of these
services. In general, however, the cooperatives are reducing the
cost of their services each year through more efficient management, and
the farmer thus benefits in the long run by joining the cooperative
society.
The
latest cooperative cotton association in the central Brazos region is
the Brazos Valley Cooperative Association. It was organized in
September, 1933, at Bryan, Texas; and the territory served consists of
the following counties: Robertson Brazos, Grimes, Washington, and
Burleson.
J.
R. McCrary of Calvert, Texas, was the first president; the board of
directors is made up of seven men including the president. This
is the only cotton cooperative association formed whose directors serve
without pay.
The
reasons for this organization being formed were that the Bottom farmers
believed they should be getting a higher price than the Texas Cotton
Cooperative Association could give, since their staple is longer than
the average for other sections of the state, and that some though a
smaller organization could serve its members better.
This
organization has established a fair minimum price based on world
markets. Therefore, since the staple of Bottom cotton is better
than the prairie cotton, the Bottom farmer secures a better
price. The following is a copy of the marketing agreement entered
into between the cotton grower and the Brazos Valley Cotton Cooperative
Association:
"Marketing
Agreement Of The Brazos Valley Cotton Cooperative Association"
"The
Brazos Valley Cotton Cooperative Association, a non-profit co-operative
marketing association with its principal office at Bryan, Brazos
County, Texas, hereinafter called 'Association', and the undersigned,
hereinafter called 'Grower', AGREE: -- "
"(1)
If not a member, the Grower hereby applies for and is admitted to
membership in said Association, and will carry out the express aims of
the Association."
"(2)
The Association buys and the Grower sells and agrees to deliver to it,
one (1) bale of cotton from and after the date of this contract;
subject only to the right of either party to terminate this contract as
hereinafter provided. The Grower, at his discretion, may deliver
more than one (1) bale of his cotton in any one year. Either
party hereto may terminate this contract by notifying the other party
in writing between March 1st and 15th of any year; provided, however,
such termination privileges shall not be effective until the Grower has
delivered the cotton covered herby for one crop year, nor so long as
the Grower is indebted to the Association, or its subsidiary
corporations."
"(3)
The Association agrees to resell such cotton of the Grower together
with the cotton delivered to it by other Growers under similar
contracts, at the best price obtainable by it under marketing
conditions; and to pay over the net amount received therefrom (less
freight, insurance, storage, and interest as payment from the Grower;
after also deducting therefrom, within the discretion of the
Association, the cost of maintaining and operating such Association and
the cost of handling, grading, and marketing such cotton, together with
the cotton of other members, and a Reserve for credit and other general
purposes, said Reserve not to exceed one (1%) percent of the gross
resale price of such cotton; said 1% Reserve shall be the property of
the Grower to be refunded to him at the discretion of the Board of
Directors of the Association, according to the book value thereof as
conclusively appraised by the Board of Directors of the
Association; I also hereby assign and transfer to the
Association, with power at its discretion, to collect any and all
Reserves and property interests due and owing me by the Texas Cotton
Cooperative Association, of Dallas, Texas, arising out of deductions
from cotton delivered to it by me as a member; and when collected that
the same shall be set up on the books of said Association to my credit
and to become a part of my Reserves in said Association and to be
refunded to me as provided in my marketing agreement of Texas Cotton
Cooperative Association."
"(4)
The Board of Directors of the Association may, in its conclusive
discretion, create and establish pools through which the cotton of the
Grower and that of other members may be handled and sold; and may
promulgate and establish from time to time rules and regulations
pertaining to the operation of such pool or pools, and the Grower
agrees to be bound thereby and to accept the proceeds realized from the
sale of his cotton through such pools, or otherwise, in accordance
therewith."
"(5)
The Grower agrees that the Association may handle and/or sell, in its
discretion, some of the cotton in one way and some in another, as to it
might seem most beneficial to the Grower and the other members of the
Association, collectively, and the Grower agrees to cooperate with it
in such transactions."
"(6)The
parties hereto agree that this is a contract of purchase and sale of
personal property and shall be binding upon them as long as the Grower
produces cotton, either directly or indirectly in accordance with this
contract; and that the Association may, in its conclusive discretion,
promulgate and establish from time to time, rules and regulations
governing the grading and classing, sale, delivery, handling, storing,
transporting, borrowing money on such cotton to make advances, or
otherwise, and for the full and complete operation of said Association
as provided in it charter and By-Laws and all amendments thereto, and
the Grower agrees to abide by and perform the same, and to be bound
thereby; provided, however, such rules and regulations shall be
evidenced by a resolution passed, by the Board of Directors of such
Association and entered on the Minutes of its meeting."
"(7)
In the event the Grower shall place a crop mortgage upon his cotton
during the term hereof, (of which he shall notify said Association),
and any money is advanced or paid to the Grower at the time of the sale
and delivery of his cotton to said Association, that the same shall
first be applied to the payment of said indebtedness, and the Grower
hereby agrees to indemnify said Association, against any damage or loss
by reason thereof, which shall be due and payable at Bryan, Texas;
failure of the Grower to comply with this mortgage requirement shall
constitute a breach of this contract."
"(8)
LOCAL ASSOCIATIONS. It is understood and agreed by and between
the Association and the Grower that the Association, in co-operation
with the Central Sales Agency, with which the Association is
affiliated, shall have the power and it shall be their duty, as soon as
is practicable, to set up and establish in the territory comprising the
Association's operations and members, local associations, with
appropriate Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws, and other necessary
and proper application and contracts in connection therewith, for the
benefit of the Grower and other members of the Association; and when
such Local Association has been so organized and incorporated, the
Grower hereby applies for membership therein and, if accepted, agrees:
(a) To execute, when requested by said Local Association, a Marketing
Contract, in terms substantially the same as those set forth in this
Marketing Contract; or (b) At the option of the Board of Directors of
such Local Association, by a resolution duly entered on the Minutes of
the meeting, to be bound by the terms of this Marketing Agreement; and
the acceptance of said Board of Directors of this contract shall become
effective immediately upon notice thereof mailed to the Grower hereof
at his address as noted below, and such notice shall be conclusively
presumed to have been accepted upon mailing thereof, which shall be
evidenced by an affidavit of the Secretary of such Local Association."
"(9)
The Board of Directors of the Association and/or the said Central Sales
Agency shall have power to organize and/or recognize Local Associations
and it shall be their duty to equitably-apportion the duties and
activities of the Association and the respective Local Association;
and, where such Local Association have been so recognized, the per bale
charge shall be limited to the charge made by the Local Association for
handling such cotton, plus the overhead per bale cost of the Central
Office of this Association."
"(10)
It is agreed by and between the parties hereto that this contract may
be modified, and amended, by the Board of Directors of the Association
from time to time; provided, however, such amendment and modification
shall only affect the members consenting thereto, but shall not affect
the contract of members who do not consent thereto or operate to
release them therefrom. It is agreed that other Marketing
Contracts may be entered into from time to time between the parties
hereto and other members of said Association; conditioned, upon the
Grower being given the opportunity to adopt the same in lieu of this
contract."
"(11)
The parties agree that there are no oral or other conditions, promises,
covenants, representations, or inducements, in addition to or at
variance with any of the terms hereof; and that this Agreement
represents the voluntary and clear understanding of the parties fully
and completely."[28]
We
must keep in mind that there are several independent buyers of cotton
yet operating in the towns along the central Brazos. However,
these men must make a higher margin of profit than the cooperative
associations in order to make any money. So, the trend of the
times seems to indicate a steady drift of the farmers to membership in
the Texas Cotton Cooperative Association or the Brazos Valley Cotton
Cooperative Association.
[25] Information
secured by interview with H. E. Wrenn, cotton buyer at Marlin, Texas,
and J. M. Kennedy, publisher of the Marlin Democrat, Marlin, Texas.
[26] W. R. McCullough and George Wolf, "Development and
Organization of Cooperative Cotton Marketing Association," American
Cotton Cooperative Association Bulletin, No. E-1 (New Orleans: American
Cotton Cooperative Association, April, 1937), p. 21.
[27] W. R. McCullough and George Wolf, "Development and
Organization of Cooperative Cotton Marketing Association," American
Cotton Cooperative Association Bulletin, No. E-1 (New Orleans: American
Cotton Cooperative Association, April, 1937), pp. 21-23.
[28] Pamphlet issued by Brazos Valley Cotton Cooperative
Association.
|